Date: 2006-03-03 03:44 am (UTC)
I'm not convinced. The proportion of women in biology is much higher than in physics; is biology really a better career than physics? (I don't know, I'm asking.)

I do agree that science isn't an attractive career from a lot of viewpoints (long hours, lots of pressure, moderate pay). On the other hand, looking around the field, I think science is actually a good field for what I'd call lower-middle-class people. I don't see very people who are from wealthy families, I don't see many from very poor families (though there are a handful), but there are quite a few who are from traditionally blue-collar type families (builders, farmers) and lots more from traditionally middle-class but poorly paid families (teachers, most obviously). Obviously there's a barrier for the very poor, who can't afford the long years of school, but if you don't mind a few years of struggling at post-doc stipends, and can scrape up the odd scholarship, then you can move into a fairly comfortable niche, salary-wise. Certainly there are better-paying options, but they all have downsides too.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 11th, 2025 03:59 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios