ext_17567 ([identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] mmcirvin 2003-08-13 01:13 pm (UTC)

And while there's always that off chance that the pre-paradigm thought is on to something, the reader really has no way of gauging that, especially if chapters 2 through 25 are bitter meditations on why the entrenched establishment is suppressing the theory.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting