ext_3718: (Default)
ext_3718 ([identity profile] agent-mimi.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] mmcirvin 2010-11-15 10:42 pm (UTC)

It makes you wonder if there was supposed to be some plot reveal or exposition explaining that Holmes had additional information that told him it was a fake painted in 1858.

Making the supernova large in the painting was probably just so those playing at home could see it on screen, although I agree that any time a TV show uses that kind of technique, it comes across as sloppy and unconvincing. There are so many other, better ways to convey clues.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting