Date: 2004-03-11 06:46 pm (UTC)
I've read Gravity's Rainbow twice -- the first time took me nearly a year, obviously in fits and starts punctuated by entire other books.

I think it's misleading to speak of its style in the singular; the style jumps around a lot. The first time I thought the first roughly 1/4 was a much harder slog than the rest. The second time it didn't seem so much different. So I don't know. But there certainly are tough passages to slog through, funny ones that are a breeze, sections where he discusses things I'd on the whole rather not think about, yadda yadda yadda. Worth reading? I thought so. In some ways I liked it better the second time... in some ways I liked it less. I probably won't give it a third read for quite some time if ever.

In any case, anyone who'd take up two pages of a novel with that story about DeMille and his young fur-henchmen can't be all bad. (BLAM! BLAM! BLAM! BLAM! BLAM! BLAM! BLAM! BLAM! BLAM! BLAM!)

Lot 49 is a fun read -- though apparently Pynchon himself thinks very little of it. Well, what does he know?

I've read V and Vineland but they didn't leave a big impression one way or the other. Somehow I missed even hearing about Mason and Dixon until now.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
89101112 1314
151617181920 21
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 23rd, 2025 01:39 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios