The BBC, BitTorrent, and Doctor Who
Aug. 27th, 2005 12:34 amHere's an interesting ArsTechnica article on the BBC's plans to simulcast TV programming on the Web. The content, at least when viewed the way they want you to, will somehow be restricted to UK viewers (you know, the ones who pay the license fees).
There are some interesting observations in the article on how the BBC's charter actually gives them an incentive to do this, but there's one point I don't quite get. As the article says:
Nevertheless, I am grateful for the BBC's refreshingly positive attitude toward the Internet, since it makes it really easy for me to stream their radio channels, including the World Service.
There are some interesting observations in the article on how the BBC's charter actually gives them an incentive to do this, but there's one point I don't quite get. As the article says:
This move was spurred on in no small part by demand for the latest incarnation of the sci-fi favorite Doctor Who. The first episode was readily available online (if you knew where to look) prior to its airing on BBC. Instead of trying to squelch distribution, the BBC took it as a "wake-up call." In a move contrary to what the US content-creation industry has done, the network decided to actually respond proactively to the issue.I don't see how simulcasts and the odd slightly-in-advance-cast are a response to this, given that the Doctor Who premiere "Rose" was such a popular download precisely because it was a rough cut leaked weeks before the actual broadcast, and subsequent interest in BitTorrenting the show was mostly from foreigners who had no other way of seeing it (particularly Americans, since the new Doctor Who probably never will air here). No intentional Internet release restricted to a UK audience would substitute for that.
Nevertheless, I am grateful for the BBC's refreshingly positive attitude toward the Internet, since it makes it really easy for me to stream their radio channels, including the World Service.