RealClimate hitting repeated home runs
Feb. 17th, 2006 12:53 amI know I link to RealClimate a lot, but the site has been running a lot of excellent articles lately. David Archer gently, and without a priori dismissal, critiques James Lovelock's despairing end-of-civilization book; Gavin Schmidt explains the problems with Richard Lindzen's climate-skeptic testimony (and in the comments, Tom Fiddaman makes a fascinating point about use of the Seventies Limits to Growth report as a strawman); Ray Pierrehumbert uses Darwin's birthday and recent discussions of evolution as a jumping-off point for a meta-discussion of global warming's status as a scientific theory.
(Meanwhile, President Bush, like Senator Inhofe, seems to prefer the authority of Michael Crichton on the subject, at least if you can believe Fred Barnes.)
(Meanwhile, President Bush, like Senator Inhofe, seems to prefer the authority of Michael Crichton on the subject, at least if you can believe Fred Barnes.)