Date: 2005-09-07 06:17 am (UTC)
I would also like to add that, unlike Stott, I'm actually quite proud of much of the blogosphere response. If you dig deeper into those super-partisan or super-ideological rants, you'll actually find that many people involved pretty much agree with him on the substantive issues if not the meta ones; for instance, see the Nielsen Haydens' blog (http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/), which normally is about as passionately Dem-partisan as they come. (The reason China MiƩville found it easy to be nonpartisan is that he's an English Marxist; everyone in America is a ridiculous far-right stooge as far as he's concerned.)

I have, so far, only seen one (1) non-ironic mention of secret weather control machines. Maybe because I'm not looking in the right places. (However, I have seen a fair amount of outrageously racist barf about cannibals and such.)

The Sept. 11th attacks didn't unite America because we were better people then. They united America because

(1) it was a deliberate attack by a foreign enemy;
(2) it scared all of us half to death (I think a lot of that was actually thanks to the mysterious Mr. Anthrax in the subsequent days; wonder where he is now?)
(3) the victims did not run vastly poorer or blacker than the American mean—I speak not so much of conscious racism/classism here as of the general sense of social estrangement from people who seem different and aren't perceived as living the same way;
(4) Bush was still a new president and there was a desire to cut him some slack on those grounds.

And I suspect we'll soon be able to add that (5) there was no Refugee Problem to speak of.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
89101112 1314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 18th, 2025 04:21 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios