mmcirvin: (Default)
[personal profile] mmcirvin
A guy in Ohio who beat up his girlfriend argues that he's not covered by the state domestic-violence law because its extension to cohabiting couples conflicts with the state's anti-gay-marriage amendment, which has a clause designed to prevent civil-union arrangements by denying the privileges of marriage to unmarried couples. An appeals court agrees, and one of the groups that pushed for the amendment actually argues that denying domestic-violence protections to cohabiters is necessary to protect the sanctity of marriage.

I can see the next argument coming a mile off: "look what the gays made us pass!"
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
89101112 1314
151617181920 21
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 28th, 2025 10:17 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios