Did you happen to update the Kibology entry? The list of example posters on the page is outdated and PISSES ME OFF GRAARRRR!!!one! ... uh, I mean, may not be indicative of the people and their culture.
I'm not sufficiently au courant with today's a.r.k to do it justice; the great thing is that you can easily fix it yourself and not be pissed off any more.
I figure it's time to stop and read a book when I'm back on www.alltheweb.com's picture service re-hashing old fandoms, hoping they've come up with more pictures I can steal for icons. (They haven't, alltheweb still beats the scary and broken google hands down)
There needs to be a term for the Wikipedia-based angst induced by looking something up and discovering that the entry is either (a) mistaken or (b) deliberately fallacious. I mean, the "Caleb" entry in the "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" category is completely ridiculous... hey, where'd everybody go?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2004-09-12 07:53 am (UTC)Explanapalooza
Date: 2004-09-12 11:26 am (UTC)One of us! One of us!
no subject
Date: 2004-09-12 06:13 pm (UTC)I think I'll just go have a little lie down...
no subject
Date: 2004-09-12 07:13 pm (UTC)ARRRRRK
Date: 2004-09-13 04:30 pm (UTC)But Wikipedia's coverage of Kibological subjects is ALREADY better than the Brittanica's!
no subject
Date: 2004-09-13 03:08 am (UTC)Wikipedia angst
Date: 2004-09-18 12:59 am (UTC)Love,
Casey B
Re: Wikipedia angst
Date: 2004-09-18 09:37 pm (UTC)Particularly the "bodyline" part.