Douglas Adams had the joke about the phase of an immature civilization's development in which it believes that digital watches are a clever idea. Digital watches are still fairly popular (mostly at the cheap end of the market), and I never had quite the antipathy to them that Adams did; but in that connection, it occurs to me that I've personally witnessed the end of the era in which humanity's nerd vanguard collectively believed that the logical place for any arbitrarily advanced item of personal tech was on one's wrist. For a time in the Eighties I actually wore what you might call a primitive wrist PDA, a Seiko watch that could store a few text messages (you entered them using an incredibly painful browse-the-alphabet-menu interface). And those Casio calculator watches were all over. I never saw one of these, though.
You actually can buy a wrist TV if you go looking for one, but only a high-octane variety of dork would actually wear one (hmm, they seem to be marketing it to obsessive sports fans). As Nathan Shumate observed, the wristphone was a non-starter, even though the necessary technology now exists and it was a perennial dream of futurists.
What are wrist-mounted devices actually good for? Displays that require no interaction, and convey little enough information that you can read them in a tiny format from some distance. That basically means a clock, with possible minor augmentations. I think the space has been pretty much explored.
You actually can buy a wrist TV if you go looking for one, but only a high-octane variety of dork would actually wear one (hmm, they seem to be marketing it to obsessive sports fans). As Nathan Shumate observed, the wristphone was a non-starter, even though the necessary technology now exists and it was a perennial dream of futurists.
What are wrist-mounted devices actually good for? Displays that require no interaction, and convey little enough information that you can read them in a tiny format from some distance. That basically means a clock, with possible minor augmentations. I think the space has been pretty much explored.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-30 07:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-30 08:38 am (UTC)Under a wrist
Date: 2005-01-30 09:01 am (UTC)Well, one more cup from my two-way-wrist-coffeemaker, and off to the parades.
Re: Under a wrist
Date: 2005-01-30 09:50 am (UTC)It seems the three places to store a cell phone are: on the belt, in the cargo pants, or at the bottom of a cluttered purse with fifteen different compartments.
Re: Under a wrist
Date: 2005-01-30 11:04 am (UTC)I used a pocket watch for a while, usually on a chain connected to a belt loop with the watch in a trouser pocket. Charming watch, but too much a pain to use. And it used up pocket real estate.
And so do those remote control fobs for car locks.
It seems the three places to store a cell phone are: on the belt, in the cargo pants, or at the bottom of a cluttered purse with fifteen different compartments.
Or the outside front zippered pocket of a purse with fifteen different compartments. Which is what I do. Of course being a Guy I call it a Bag and not a Purse, and it's very functional black Cordura.
I keep my PDA in the same pocket. Before I got the cell phone I kept the PDA in a case, usually on my belt, but when I added the phone (and the handsfree, and the charger, and the manual which I needed occasionally when I first got the phone) I decided to go the Bag route.
And as of Friday we have a new car, replacing the 1994 Corolla, so I now have two remote fobs. The good news is... the new car, a Prius, has the "smart entry / smart start" option, which means the fob almost never actually has to be dug out and manipulated, it just has to be on my person somewhere... so it's living in the bag, too, at least for now. We'll see how that works out.
No MP3 player living there, yet.
Re: Under a wrist
Date: 2005-01-30 10:33 am (UTC)Re: Under a wrist
Date: 2005-01-30 10:59 am (UTC)Also, I can't help but notice that the US is the only place where "cell phones have bad sound quality" jokes seem to exist.
Re: Under a wrist
Date: 2005-01-31 04:05 pm (UTC)Sincerely, Your pal, Whitey
Re: Under a wrist
Date: 2005-01-30 06:25 pm (UTC)My grandma's 1930s telephone had better sound than my cell. I would still use her phone if I was confident enough to solder the wire that came unattached.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-30 09:48 am (UTC)I'd also like a wrist compass.
Also, Leela from Futurama wore a computer the size ofa large bracer.
Also, a reminder watch: "The training function reminds the user to perform specified behavior (GO BATHROOM, STRETCH, POSTURE) at designated intervals such as every 3, 5, 10 or up to every 60 minutes."
no subject
Date: 2005-01-30 10:21 am (UTC)I'm amused by how much of the media cooing over the social implications of the iPod applies equally well to an early-1980s Walkman. (That same Web site laments that the remaining personal cassette stereos you can buy now are often worse than the ones you could get 20 years ago, because they're now considered cheap, outmoded commodities rather than cool, stylish items.)
But the wrist seems like a suboptimal place for an MP3 player; I suppose you can see the display and controls well there, but it also means there's a wire running from your wrist. For just listening, the bicep band or belt hook are probably better. (Or just integrate them into the headset like those teeny Eighties head-radios (or the monstrous Seventies ones), but the design seems to be evolving away from that option. As a general rule, though, I suppose you can put a flash MP3 player now anywhere you could put an FM radio 20 years ago.)
no subject
Date: 2005-01-30 11:07 am (UTC)That works for me as long as I'm vertical. But I have a hard time remembering to guard against stuff falling out of the pocket when I bend over to pick something up. I destroyed my first PDA that way.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-30 10:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-30 12:18 pm (UTC)There's also this super l33t geek watch. Of course, we have cell phones to do that new, amongst other useless functions formerly provided by digital watches.
-- Schwa ---
no subject
Date: 2005-01-30 03:06 pm (UTC)