Poking the anthill
Mar. 28th, 2005 09:39 amNot to sound like an Apple sycophant or starry-eyed MP3-revolution convert, but I'm not sure precisely what Andrew Orlowski is complaining about here:
- The asocial quality (and potential for ear damage) of music listened to on headphones, as opposed to the music-filled world of the colorful and vibrant Third World masses who are happier than us deracinated First Worlders? If so, then despite Orlowski's claim, this evil has little to do with digital music or Apple; a product first sold in large numbers by Sony in the early 1980s comes to mind. Personally, I wouldn't wander around outside listening to a personal stereo with headphones; when I'm out there, I prefer to hear the world around me; but if he wants to fill the world with social music, his real target, I suppose, ought to be every heartless crank who complains about somebody's blaring boom box or music-blasting car.
- DRM and crappy corporate pop music? I can see a large part of his point there, but there's no law that says you have to fill your iPod with DRMed corporate pop music. Apple would, perhaps, like you to, being a corporation out for money that has cut deals with entertainment moguls, but they wouldn't sell any of these things if they made you do it. (Based on daily experience, I am also pretty much 100% certain that if Americans, Europeans, etc. went out of our way to fill our social world with music, this would, by and large, be crappy music.)
- He seems to be specifically upset about Apple's tightening of restrictions on iTunes library sharing, induced by the aforementioned music-industry deals. I can understand this frustration, but, again, it isn't as if other methods don't exist.