More teenage bookcase embarrassments
Dec. 18th, 2005 08:07 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Crooked Timber has a thread up on the ever-popular subject of books you're embarrassed to have loved, as discussed here over a year ago.
What's striking is that the same names keep coming up over and over: Erich von Däniken, Richard Bach, Ayn Rand, Piers Anthony, Robert Heinlein (though several people point out that the shame with Heinlein is not to enjoy his work but to take him as your personal guru). And Jake even mentioned Colin Wilson in a very different context.
Somebody quoted Ursula Le Guin as saying that kids might like junk but no kid is dumb enough to like Jonathan Livingston Seagull. Wrong.
What's striking is that the same names keep coming up over and over: Erich von Däniken, Richard Bach, Ayn Rand, Piers Anthony, Robert Heinlein (though several people point out that the shame with Heinlein is not to enjoy his work but to take him as your personal guru). And Jake even mentioned Colin Wilson in a very different context.
Somebody quoted Ursula Le Guin as saying that kids might like junk but no kid is dumb enough to like Jonathan Livingston Seagull. Wrong.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-18 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-18 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-18 09:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-18 09:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-18 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-18 10:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-18 10:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-19 06:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-18 09:35 pm (UTC)I liked it when I read it, and eventually chalked up the disturbing aspects of it to conscious "Starship Troopers" homage. Note also that while I'm sure he always had the thing about gayness, Card seems to have gradually drifted further into right-wing nutbag territory over time; I have vague memories that back in the Eighties some of what he wrote sounded like centrist critiques of Reaganism.
A few years back I read the long-delayed second volume of his collection of good stories of the Eighties, Future on Ice. His introductory material was absurdly cranky, consisting of equal parts excoriation of the cyberpunks and excoriation of Bill Clinton. I can certainly understand the drive to bash a US president you don't like, but doing it in a collection of stories explicitly selected from a decade in which he was not president is a little odd. Bashing the cyberpunks at least did have something to do with the 1980s, though, as Gardner Dozois remarked, it seemed like a sad reenactment of a battle that nobody could remember the reasons for any more.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-20 05:37 am (UTC)I don't know the first thing about Dan Brown, but I do know those blog entries are amusing.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-18 11:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-19 11:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-20 10:16 am (UTC)I dunno, I remember liking it. It's been awhile since I read it though.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-20 10:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-20 03:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-20 07:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-20 07:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-20 10:18 am (UTC)Hee hee hee hee hee.
You know, I'm almost convinced that Brown does it on purpose.
"We should," the man fired back. "We invented it."
That reminds me of the episode in the new Doctor Who series where the Doctor and Rose meet a man who claims to own the Internet. Rose protests that no one owns the Internet, and the man replies, "Yes, and let's just let people keep thinking that."