More teenage bookcase embarrassments
Dec. 18th, 2005 08:07 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Crooked Timber has a thread up on the ever-popular subject of books you're embarrassed to have loved, as discussed here over a year ago.
What's striking is that the same names keep coming up over and over: Erich von Däniken, Richard Bach, Ayn Rand, Piers Anthony, Robert Heinlein (though several people point out that the shame with Heinlein is not to enjoy his work but to take him as your personal guru). And Jake even mentioned Colin Wilson in a very different context.
Somebody quoted Ursula Le Guin as saying that kids might like junk but no kid is dumb enough to like Jonathan Livingston Seagull. Wrong.
What's striking is that the same names keep coming up over and over: Erich von Däniken, Richard Bach, Ayn Rand, Piers Anthony, Robert Heinlein (though several people point out that the shame with Heinlein is not to enjoy his work but to take him as your personal guru). And Jake even mentioned Colin Wilson in a very different context.
Somebody quoted Ursula Le Guin as saying that kids might like junk but no kid is dumb enough to like Jonathan Livingston Seagull. Wrong.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-19 04:08 pm (UTC)Other than that, I may have grown out of a lot of books, but I'm not embarassed that I used to like them. Not even those stupid adventure novels written by men as an excuse for softcore sex scenes. Those were popular when I was a teenager. I WILL NOT BE EMBARASSED.
What embarasses me are old writings and reports. Stuff I thought was terrific seems so pedestrian now, and it irks me when I remember teachers who encouraged these things. Did they think what I wrote was great for a 20 year old, or did they think it was great on any level? Because it's not great. And they may be really terrible professors if they thought it was great research.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-19 06:07 pm (UTC)