Canons and discovery
Jan. 7th, 2006 09:53 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Here's another one of those "ten classical albums for newbies" lists.
While I love me some Beethoven's Ninth and Carmina Burana, I do wonder whether this sort of canon-first approach even works. I tried to go the "classical music for newbies" route for years and there were some pieces I liked well enough, but I never really felt confident about digging deeper until I met Sam. What she did, more or less by accident, was introduce me to some specific subgenres that had a more immediate and visceral appeal to me than the standard canon (19th and 20th century wind-band music, in this case), to the point where I became just a little bit of a connoisseur and actually cared about the differences between different recordings and arrangements. Once you've started to specialize like that, it makes you more confident about branching out to other things. I'm still not hugely knowledgeable about classical music today, but I don't feel as if it's something foreign to me.
I think this is also part of the reason why forced readings in high-school English class aren't very effective at getting kids interested in literature. Being forced to read the canon will get you some exposure to the big picture but it usually won't give you the feeling that a little piece of this world is yours.
Unfortunately, that feeling is inherently something it's hard to arrive at systematically; it's hard to see how to contrive to discover something special to you. People sometimes ask me to recommend good science fiction to them, and I had the idea a while back of coming up with a sort of multi-canonical list, of good or important books categorized by style or subgenre; so that instead of reading the whole canon of Books Everyone Should Know, you start with a more depth-first exploration of a piece of the world that has a chance of appealing to you more individually. But even that is probably hit-or-miss.
While I love me some Beethoven's Ninth and Carmina Burana, I do wonder whether this sort of canon-first approach even works. I tried to go the "classical music for newbies" route for years and there were some pieces I liked well enough, but I never really felt confident about digging deeper until I met Sam. What she did, more or less by accident, was introduce me to some specific subgenres that had a more immediate and visceral appeal to me than the standard canon (19th and 20th century wind-band music, in this case), to the point where I became just a little bit of a connoisseur and actually cared about the differences between different recordings and arrangements. Once you've started to specialize like that, it makes you more confident about branching out to other things. I'm still not hugely knowledgeable about classical music today, but I don't feel as if it's something foreign to me.
I think this is also part of the reason why forced readings in high-school English class aren't very effective at getting kids interested in literature. Being forced to read the canon will get you some exposure to the big picture but it usually won't give you the feeling that a little piece of this world is yours.
Unfortunately, that feeling is inherently something it's hard to arrive at systematically; it's hard to see how to contrive to discover something special to you. People sometimes ask me to recommend good science fiction to them, and I had the idea a while back of coming up with a sort of multi-canonical list, of good or important books categorized by style or subgenre; so that instead of reading the whole canon of Books Everyone Should Know, you start with a more depth-first exploration of a piece of the world that has a chance of appealing to you more individually. But even that is probably hit-or-miss.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-07 08:09 am (UTC)And then you've got the problem of, okay, what ARE you looking for in a media item? And generally, not being familiar with the genre, you probably don't really know. It's a sad state of affairs. I guess that's what people try to get at via tagging music with keywords, but keywords are so fallible, being self-generated that I can't think they work all that often.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-07 09:00 am (UTC)With science fiction, it's a little different. Nobody feels they have to know about SF as part of a cultural education, since, while it doesn't have the social stigma it had fifty years ago, it's certainly not considered highbrow Art by people outside the fan community. But I do get the impression that many technically astute people, or people who like a science-fiction TV show or movie or two, do think something along the lines of "this seems like a genre that is supposed to appeal to people like me; maybe I should give it a try". And they maybe pick out a few books at random, or things their friends recommended, and are often dismayed to discover that they're uninvolving or just plain bad.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-07 10:10 am (UTC)They're also encouraged to think of this music as something that happened in the past and that ended at about the time recording technology made its appearance, which just isn't true.
Big, monolithic things
Date: 2006-01-08 10:54 am (UTC)Messiah? It's certainly a favorite of those of us who love "that sort of thing," but insanely boring for those who don't. How about something light and funny like Acis and Galatea? Goldberg? Snorefest! (Also, Gould's second recording is just outright creepy, what with all the grunting and moaning. I can't sit in the same room with someone else and listen to it, and it actually makes my wife physically ill.) The Brandenburgs have a lot more of something for everyone. (Hey! I just found my warped copy of the Günter Kehr recording and it's actually playable!) Mozart and Beethoven's most mature symphonies? Well, Mozart maybe, since he was always just a kid, but if you want mature why not the Requiem or C Minor Mass? For Beethoven, I'd sample the middle and late string quartets--skipping the early ones because you'd get there through Mozart anyway.
Re: Big, monolithic things
Date: 2006-01-08 11:08 am (UTC)Of course, it's possible to err in the other direction, and emphasize the same self-consciously introductory pieces so much that they become overfamiliar even to newbies. One of the last Peanuts strips that was actually funny was one in which Peppermint Patty remarks on how "Tiny Tots" orchestra concerts ought to play something other than "Peter and the Wolf".
Shot by canon
Date: 2006-01-07 11:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-07 11:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-07 09:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-08 10:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-08 01:27 pm (UTC)More detail, please?
no subject
Date: 2006-01-08 09:26 pm (UTC)I've heard it theorized that the Beethoven week on BBC radio that I blogged about a while back may have been inspired by WHRB's Orgies, though I do not know if there is any real connection.
snooty nerds are still nerds
Date: 2006-01-08 01:26 pm (UTC)I actually feel more embarassed for not knowing more about the Brave New Waves kind of stuff, because of that annoying indie rock cred angle more of my friends seem to play off of. The unfortunate part is that I am slowly admitting that I generally hate indie rock, mostly on account of not liking rock, guitars, or impassioned wailing much at all. Techno is usually okay in its more experimental forms, but I get the impression that it is passe now and cutting-edge music is all back to screaming and distortion (with some techno in the background). ugh.
Re: snooty nerds are still nerds
Date: 2006-01-08 09:29 pm (UTC)Re: snooty nerds are still nerds
Date: 2006-01-08 09:53 pm (UTC)You will also find some of his music here. There only seems to be three pieces, though.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-07 12:00 pm (UTC)Unfortunately, she had a problem with preconceived ideas, so when I read Frankenstein, she flunked my report without even reading it. The book was my first experience with public perception (based on a tremendous number of film and TV adaptations of the Frankenstein idea) versus the reality of the book and I learned a lot from it, more so than any other book I read that year.
What connects with a student is not easily pre-determined. Encouraging them to read anything is a good idea, and if a student latches on to a series or genre they like, be happy about it. You'd be surprised how many teachers try to pound certain books down their students' throats. It's probably near 100% of English teachers.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-08 03:46 am (UTC)This is precisely what I did with my son. With the obvious exception of porn, I never censored what he read. As a result, he was tested at 12th grade level english skills in the 8th grade. That's the secret, I think. Be happy about it. They're reading and they're enjoying it.
The Gravity Stealers
Date: 2006-01-07 06:42 pm (UTC)did you ever get to look at this book I sent Kibo? It was meant to be written and illustrated by children from "The Argonauts Club" (radio show from the 50's) in Australia. I am trying all find all of my books randomly like that.
On classical music, the concerts with music from the Final Fantasy games and other Japanese composers are also a good way to introduce classical style music to a new audience. I think the Miyazaki music nights also sold out. I also remember reading an interview with a member of an orchestra who talked about "throwing up" in her mind when she has to play the same old stuff over and over.
Re: The Gravity Stealers
Date: 2006-01-07 08:14 pm (UTC)