Are you wonkish enough to be President?
Mar. 7th, 2006 09:30 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So George Will wrote some column in which he implied that John Edwards had never heard of conservative social theorist James Q. Wilson, and Michael Tomasky got in a big argument on the American Prospect group blog about whether this mattered or not (if true), and eventually he posted his pop quiz of things you ought to know if you are going to be President.
He figured you ought to score at least 15 out of 20 to be fit to run the country. I only got 11, though there was one other where I just got part of the name wrong and a couple others where I said "damn, I should have gotten that" afterward. For some reason, I did better on the ones he considered higher-priced than on the ones he seems to have thought were gimmes. Anyway, I have no intention of being President so I can revel in my ignorance.
He should have had it calculate which screaming Sunday-morning pundit you are.
He figured you ought to score at least 15 out of 20 to be fit to run the country. I only got 11, though there was one other where I just got part of the name wrong and a couple others where I said "damn, I should have gotten that" afterward. For some reason, I did better on the ones he considered higher-priced than on the ones he seems to have thought were gimmes. Anyway, I have no intention of being President so I can revel in my ignorance.
He should have had it calculate which screaming Sunday-morning pundit you are.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 07:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 07:15 pm (UTC)Wonkishness vs simple willingness to research & learn
Date: 2006-03-07 07:33 pm (UTC)Re: Wonkishness vs simple willingness to research & learn
Date: 2006-03-07 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-08 04:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-08 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-12 08:30 pm (UTC)Q: Back to George Will. He suggested that you did not recognize the name James Q. Wilson. Do you know who James Q. Wilson is?
A: Yes, he’s a conservative thinker, a smart guy. I don’t claim to have studied everything James Q. Wilson has done, but I do recognize the name.
Full Interview (http://www.newsobserver.com/164/story/416713.html)