![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I have it on good authority that one is required by law to buy a fancy still and/or video camera when expecting a baby. I was telling myself I couldn't justify the expense of buying a really nice one, when I was informed that various monetary gifts I got for my birthday were required to be pooled toward a new digicam rather than spent on the yu hsiang pork at Sichuan Gourmet in Billerica.
As much as I love Sichuan Gourmet, I had to agree that this was a good idea.
Like
derspatchel, I was looking seriously at the beautiful Canon S3 IS and balking slightly at the price, especially considering that you have to budget a bunch of money for accessories on top of that (a decent-sized memory card, battery charger, and case, at the very least.)
I then discovered that its predecessor, the S2 IS, is now available as a clearance item for dramatically lower prices. I've already handled this thing at stores and immediately wanted one. The main differences are that the S2 has a 5MP sensor instead of 6MP, which as far as I'm concerned is no difference at all; and the S2 is silver instead of black, so the camera geeks with 800 dollar DSLRs will laugh at you. I can live with that. DPReview fretted a bit that the S3 wasn't really that much better, though they are both excellent cameras. So I've ordered the S2.
This is good.
As much as I love Sichuan Gourmet, I had to agree that this was a good idea.
Like
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I then discovered that its predecessor, the S2 IS, is now available as a clearance item for dramatically lower prices. I've already handled this thing at stores and immediately wanted one. The main differences are that the S2 has a 5MP sensor instead of 6MP, which as far as I'm concerned is no difference at all; and the S2 is silver instead of black, so the camera geeks with 800 dollar DSLRs will laugh at you. I can live with that. DPReview fretted a bit that the S3 wasn't really that much better, though they are both excellent cameras. So I've ordered the S2.
This is good.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-04 01:27 am (UTC)Have fun with it.
When is the baby due, again?
no subject
Date: 2006-06-04 01:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-04 03:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-04 03:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-04 03:48 am (UTC)Skating events are hard because the lighting is indoor lighting and the people are far away. Sam's usually had the best luck (with my dinky old Nikon 2500, and her much nicer Sony) photographing stationary things like initial and final positions on the ice. But even there I could tell she could really have used a stabilized long zoom.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-04 03:54 am (UTC)The stabilizing zoom is fantastic. It works really well.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-04 03:56 am (UTC)On the other hand, the weird swiveling lens on my Nikon almost invites finger smudges even from adults, since opening it up involves handling the piece that the lens is on.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-04 04:00 am (UTC)It's possible that William enhanced the problem by throwing a toy dinosaur at the lens, apparently looking for an action shot. He got action he wasn't anticipating, all right.
Fortunately the vendor (Beach Camera, a plug here for good service) replaced the camera without question and I haven't had any problems with the replacement.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-05 01:03 pm (UTC)Heh.
Don't ask me how I know this.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-05 01:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 12:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 12:15 am (UTC)