Red Radka

Jun. 9th, 2006 12:52 am
mmcirvin: (Default)
[personal profile] mmcirvin
This camera actually makes flash photos of cats sort of feasible, though they might not entirely like it:


Brown tabby Radka sits on the red ornate bedspread, looking slightly peeved at the flash

Date: 2006-06-09 12:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paracelsvs.livejournal.com
I've noticed when trying to photograph cats that they don't seem to react to the flash at all. You'd think that with their sensitive eyes, the flash would be annoying, but they show no sign of noticing it at all. It is mysterious.

Date: 2006-06-09 12:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
Mine don't startle at the flash, but do tend to avoid looking right at it after the first shot. This camera has a green autofocus assist lamp that also bugs them a little bit, though not as much as the flash.

Date: 2006-06-09 01:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
...And come to think of it, the autofocus lamp may actually be part of what cuts down on the demonic eye-shine, since it warns the cats not to look straight at the flash more effectively than the typical redeye-reduction pre-flash does.

Date: 2006-06-09 12:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skapusniak.livejournal.com
She's obviously channeling her inner Travis Bickle in that shot.

some unrelated observations

Date: 2006-06-09 02:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
Everyone who writes about this camera complains that the lens cap is too loose and tends to fall off. It's true, but I also think it's intentional. The lens barrel extends fully at startup, and if the mechanism's as delicate as people say it is, it's probably important that the lens cap be made to pop off harmlessly if this accidentally happens while the cap is on. I've already managed to do this once.

Another common complaint is that the viewfinder is hard to use in bright light, since it's not a simple optical tunnel or an SLR but an electronic viewfinder similar to the ones in video cameras, basically a smaller, lower-power LCD with an eyepiece. We'll see. The viewfinder does have a diopter correction knob, but I can also use it wearing glasses without much trouble. The main LCD is a tilt-and-swivel type, which is nice; my old Nikon's swiveling lens was one of the niftiest things about it, since you could easily use it to take pictures from waist height, over your head or pointing back at yourself.

I got Canon's soft case, which is nice-looking but only large enough to hold the camera itself, without any accessories.

It will be interesting to see how awkward this thing is to carry around in the field. I've only had pocket cameras before, and this is definitely not a pocket camera--I might keep the Nikon around for that purpose. On the other hand, it's much smaller than an SLR.

Re: some unrelated observations

Date: 2006-06-09 02:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
...actually, come to think of it, my first camera was a Polaroid One-Step. It's smaller than that.

Re: some unrelated observations

Date: 2006-06-09 02:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iayork.livejournal.com
I got Canon's soft case, which is nice-looking but only large enough to hold the camera itself, without any accessories.

I got a 3rd-party camera bag, the (let's see ... ) Tamrac 5693 Digital 3 Bag for Canon G3, G5, G6, & S1 IS (Black) from Adorama Camera, I think through Amazon.com. It's a very good size, holds the camera snugly and has room for spare batteries and a few small accessories but isn't too bulky.

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 12th, 2025 08:48 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios