mmcirvin: (Default)
[personal profile] mmcirvin
Well, the 2012 election put to rest once and for all the idea that Americans will never vote to legalize same-sex marriage. In that light, it's interesting to compare these two maps from Wikipedia:

Legal status of same-sex marriage in the US, by state
Public opinion of same-sex marriage in the US, by state

Public opinion is way out ahead of the law. In California, Oregon, Colorado, Michigan, Ohio, and Florida, there's majority public support for same-sex marriage and a constitutional ban. That's a substantial chunk of the country. In the latter three, the bans are so strong that they also prohibit civil unions.

It was always pretty clear that the great wave of state-constitutional bans in 2004-2008 was a rear-guard action to lock in opposition before it evaporated, but I didn't expect it to happen so quickly. The wave of SSM legalization will probably slow down a bit in the near future just because of the greater procedural difficulty of amending state constitutions.

Re: Maybe not in California...

Date: 2013-01-26 03:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
...or is the difficulty in California that of amending the constitution in such a way that it won't just be amended right back again in the next low-turnout election? I can see that being a problem.

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27 28293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 31st, 2025 12:35 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios