mmcirvin: (Default)
[personal profile] mmcirvin
Via Gary Farber, here's a strange New York Times article pondering aloud how the "red state/blue state" coloring convention suddenly became set in stone in the popular imagination in the aftermath of the 2000 presidential election, despite not having existed previously. Their graphic shows various news sources in 2000 all happening to color Republican states red and Democratic states blue, but if I recall correctly, there was some major network that night (ABC?) that used the opposite convention. And I also remember TV guys describing Reagan's sweep in 1984 as a "blue wave", though I'm pretty sure that color coding was far from universal, too.

My theory about the modern tendency is that it's actually a reaction to the traditional association of red with far-left politics; Communism is so discredited in the US that nobody wants to be seen accusing Democrats of being Commies. But it wasn't a very strong tendency anyway, until discussions of the 2000 election mess froze an essentially arbitrary assignment.

Addendum: Oh, yeah, now I remember what I was going to say. In that article, Leatrice Eiseman of Pantone suggests replacing the color coding with stars for one party and stripes for the other. It shocks me that anyone associated with the graphic design industry would make a suggestion that bad—the meaningless visual buzz would make the diagram almost unreadable. I can imagine Edward Tufte's reaction already.

Date: 2004-02-10 01:34 am (UTC)
jwgh: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jwgh
They could make it so that the Democratic states would poke your left eye out, and the Republican states would poke your right eye out.

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
456789 10
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 3rd, 2026 07:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios