mmcirvin: (Default)
[personal profile] mmcirvin
My monitor, a big old CRT that I inherited from Sam, has developed Imminent Death Syndrome. Occasionally, it is dead, but it gets better. Clearly it is not long for this world.

I'm thinking of getting a flat panel, just because CRTs are horrible massive power-hungry things and I hate them, and we're going to have to rearrange a lot of the furniture in here for reasons you already know. But my carefree days of massive discretionary income are drawing to a close and the LCD panels in my price range are considerably lower-resolution than this thing is currently running.

On the other hand, I'm running at 1600x1200 now mostly because I can, in 3D it's really more than my video card can handle with ease, and the pixels are pretty fuzzy; it'd be nice to use something considerably not-fuzzy even if the resolution is lower. And, hey, subpixel font antialiasing.

I'm sure there was a point to this.

Date: 2006-03-03 04:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pentomino.livejournal.com
I remember seeing subpixel font antialiasing demonstrated in a Microsoft keynote thing. Does that mean Macs can't do it?

Date: 2006-03-03 04:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
Windows had it earlier, but Mac OS X got a pretty good implementation a few versions back.

Date: 2006-03-03 04:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pootrootbeer.livejournal.com
And Windows's implementation is probably closely tied to TrueType-based font rendering, which means Apple's PDF-based implementation isn't even similar enough to violate a patent.

Date: 2006-03-03 04:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] piehead.livejournal.com
You can get Dell's 24" monste on sale for... $800. Which is probably more than is reasonable to drop on a monitor, especially what with and all.

Date: 2006-03-05 08:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
I sprang for the Dell 20-incher. We'll see. I can stand a few stuck pixels, I think.

Date: 2006-03-07 06:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
The Dell 20-incher arrived today! 1600x1200 just like I like it.

Damn, is this a nice monitor. No stuck pixels that I've noticed yet. I was a little too late for the additional $50 off but I still kept it under $500.

I ordered the magic dongle that will let me get a digital connection through my freaky old ADC port, but I'm not sure it was really necessary; I'm getting a fine signal through the analog now. Maybe I should have held off on that.

Date: 2006-03-07 07:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] piehead.livejournal.com
Awesome.

Date: 2006-03-03 07:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stacebass.livejournal.com
17" Acer under $200 (http://www.insight.com/site/product/detail/index.cfm?item_number=ET%2E1706B%2E000&scSourceCode=HH059&cm_re=HH059-_-zone4-_-ET%2E1706B%2E000). And if you go to www.insight.com/friends, you'll get a discount because you're my pal.

Date: 2006-03-03 11:28 pm (UTC)
kodi: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kodi
Samsung 214T ($660) is what I'd go with if I didn't already have a 213T. Other people prefer other monitors, but I find this one looks the best of the sub-$1000 19"+ monitors. But it took me a few months to strengthen my resolve to the point I was willing to play stuck-pixel lotto with $700.

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 8th, 2025 08:33 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios